The conference was convened to develop a strategy for the nomination of the eight Ohio earthwork sites being considered for the prestigious World Heritage List maintained by United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
In 2008, eight Ohio earthworks were selected by the United States Department of the Interior for inclusion on the United States’ Tentative List of sites to be submitted to UNESCO for inscription on the World Heritage List based on two nominations prepared by the National Park Service and the Ohio Historical Society. One nomination was for Serpent Mound in Adams County, constructed by the Fort Ancient culture.
The other nomination was of Hopewell Ceremonial Sites: the Newark Earthworks in Licking County, Fort Ancient in Warren County, and the five earthworks included in Hopewell Cultural National Historical Park in Ross County: Mound City, Hopeton Earthworks, Hopewell Mound Group, Seip Earthworks, and High Bank Works.
Conference participants included scholars from across the nation: archaeologists, anthropologists, and cultural landscape historians; museum and park administrators with experience in the intensive nomination process; and Native Americans to whom these sites are sacred.
At the conclusion of the conference, participants were optimistic about the progress of the nominations, but were well aware of the work remaining to document the merit of the sites. The earliest either of the nominations could be inscribed on the World Heritage list would be 2014, and there is no guarantee of this.
The conference was funded by The Ohio State University Newark Earthworks Center, the Ohio Humanities Council, the Ohio Archaeological Council, Cincinnati Preservation Association, Warren County Convention and Visitors Bureau, and the Ross County Convention and Visitors Bureau and with donations from individuals as well as funds from the Ohio Historical Society and Hopewell Cultural National Historical Park.
Ohio Historical Society
4 comments:
The wording "and Native Americans to whom these sites are sacred" is a quite biased description. Is it a euphemism for "the Native Americans who built the sites"?
Unknown,
The reference to "Native Americans to whom these sites are sacred" simply refers to contemporary Native Americans whose ancestors may, or may not, have built the sites, but who regard the sites as sacred in the present.
I'm puzzled as to why you think this is a "quite biased description" of these people. Surely they know whether they think the sites are sacred or not.
The "Native Americans who built the sites" would have to be hundreds to thousands of years old to attend the conference today after building the sites between 0 and 1400 AD.
Anonymous,
"Native Americans who built the sites" is your phrase. The blog simply says, "Native Americans to whom these sites are sacred," which need not imply that they were the builders -- or even that they have a direct relationship with the builders.
Post a Comment