Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Old Questions, New Science - a public symposium

Where did the ancestors of the Native Americans come from, how did they get here, and how long have they been here? What is the latest archaeological and genetic evidence for the peopling of the Americas? Did multiple groups of people colonize the Americas? How have scientific and popular views of Native American origins changed in the past 200 years?

The Johnson-Humrickhouse Museum in Coshocton, Ohio, will present on April 25, 2009, a public symposium entitled, Old Questions, New Science: Reinterpreting Native American Origins in light of modern methods and technology. Anthropologists and archaeologists have worked together for two hundred years to develop a cohesive understanding of the origins of American Indian cultures. Using new scientific methods and technological innovations, scientists today can repudiate unfounded suppositions while providing new and exciting theories.

Old Questions, New Science will examine the archaeological theories and speculations of both the 19th and 21st centuries. New technologies that have revolutionized our understanding of the first Americans include the growing field of molecular anthropology. Studies of the DNA of modern American Indians have revealed evidence for an Asian migration during the late Pleistocene Epoch. The symposium also will address archaeological conundrums such as the Kennewick Man (9,000 year-old human remains discovered in Washington State in 1996) and reports of pre-Columbian contacts between the Americas and Asia, Europe, and Africa.


Five sessions will be presented:

In the Beginning: The Early Search for Human Origins in the New World.
Dr. Terry A. Barnhart

The search for human origins in the western hemisphere began in the 15th century and continues today. Archaeology, a model of empirical science, has played an essential role in that odyssey from the late seventeenth century to the present time. Theories continue to change as archaeologists formulate new methodologies that greatly advance the accumulation of knowledge about America's ancient remains and peoples. But the quest to infer and extrapolate the unknown from the known has been a constant from that day to this. Dr. Barnhart will focus on how the study of the prehistoric mounds and earthworks of the Ohio Valley contributed to that discourse from the first Euro-American encounters with the mounds in the 1780s down to the close of the 19th century.

Dr. Terry A. Barnhart is professor of history at Eastern Illinois University. Dr. Barnhart joined the History Department at Eastern in 1994, having previously worked within the Education Division at the Ohio Historical Society since 1983. He is the authoritative voice on 19th century Ohio anthropology and archaeology. He has authored one book, Ephraim George Squier and the Development of American Anthropology, contributed chapters to several other books, and published numerous journal articles on the history of 19th century American archaeology and anthropology.

Contemporary archaeological methods and recent discoveries.
Dr. Bradley Lepper

When did people first discover the Americas? Were these people Asians, Australians, or Europeans? Did they trek over the Bering land bridge, coast-hop in simple watercraft, or cross the icy Atlantic in fleets of kayaks? Were they hunters of big game or gatherers of nuts and shellfish? Was their way of life ended by the catastrophic impact of an asteroid or comet? Or did they simply adapt to changing circumstances with incremental changes in technology? You might think that with all the know-how and firepower of 21st century science, the answers to these questions would be coming into sharper focus, but a perusal of recent articles in newspapers and popular science magazines would make it appear that we're farther than ever from a consensus on these and other questions about the earliest inhabitants of the New World. Ohio Historical Society archaeologist Bradley Lepper examines what we know, what we don't know, and why we may not know what we think we know about the first Americans.

Dr. Bradley Lepper is a Curator of Archaeology for the Ohio Historical Society and an occasional visiting professor at Denison University. He is the author of Ohio Archaeology: an illustrated chronicle of Ohio's ancient American Indian cultures, winner of the Society for American Archaeology's 2007 Public Audience Book Award. He also writes a bi-weekly column on archaeology for the Columbus Dispatch.

The practical importance of Native American population genetics.
Dr. Cecil M. Lewis

How are genetic data used to infer population history and why are such studies are important? Recent findings resulting from collaborations with Native American communities in North and South America will be presented.

Dr. Lewis is Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, at the University of Oklahoma. He has published a number or articles in scientific journals as well as in edited volumes, the most recent in New Bioarchaeological Perspectives: Essays in Honor of Jane E. Buikstra (still in press). Dr Lewis recently co-published “the largest genome-wide survey of genetic markers for native American communities.” His studies examine how human genetic variation is structured between different regions of the world. From these findings, he can infer the number and path of initial migrations into the Americas.

Persistent Mysteries: Unanswered Questions about American Antiquity.
Dr. Kenneth L. Feder

Though much progress has been made in illuminating America’s ancient past, it cannot be denied that mysteries about that past persist. Archaeologists view these mysteries as fascinating challenges—and temporary ones, at that—that will be solved even as new mysteries present themselves. Such is the nature of science. Dr. Kenneth Feder will focus on a number of significant, but as yet unanswered questions about America’s past including: 1) Who were the first Americans and when did they arrive here? 2) What (or who) was responsible for the massive die-off of large animals at the end of the Pleistocene? and 3) Was there contact between Native America and Asia, Europe, or Africa before Columbus arrived in AD 1492 and before the Norse settlement of Newfoundland at around AD 1000?

Dr. Kenneth L. Feder teaches archaeology at Central Connecticut State University where he is a Full Professor of Anthropology. He has authored a number of books on archaeology including Frauds, Myths and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology.

A summary period will allow time for any follow-up comments and questions. This hour will begin by allowing the speakers to engage each other or clarify their talking points. Then the floor will be given to the audience for questions and comments. Leading this session is Dr. Robert Fox, a corporate ergonomist and Friend of the Museum. Dr. Fox did his graduate work in anthropology and the population biology of ancient populations with focus on the ancient Egyptians.

Old Questions, New Science: Reinterpreting Native American Origins in light of modern methods and technology will be held on April 25, 2009, from 9:00 A.M. – 3:30 P.M. at the Johnson-Humrickhouse Museum. 300 N. Whitewoman St., Roscoe Village, Coshocton, OH 43812.

To acquire a registration form, contact the museum at 740-622-8710 or E-mail jhmuseum@sbcglobal.net.

Forms are also available at http://jhmuseum.org/symposium2009/registration.pdf.

Early registration fee is $22.00 and $17.00 for students with I.D. Late registration, after April 21st, is $25.00. Fee includes a Proceedings booklet and morning refreshments.

The Ohio Arts Council helps fund the museum with state tax dollars to encourage economic growth, educational excellence and cultural enrichment for all Ohioans.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Spotlight on Research


This week we were visited by researcher Christine Keller, a Master's student with Ball State University in Muncie, Indiana. While she was here I sat down to talk to her about her research, Glacial Kame Sandal Sole Gorgets: An Exploration of Manufacture, Use, Distribution, and Public Exhibition.

Pansing: Christine thank you so much for taking time away from your research to answer a few question about what you are working on.
Keller: Glad to do it!
Pansing: How did you become interested in archaeology?
Keller: I have always been interested in archaeology and my family has done a lot of traveling to National Parks and historic sites. So when I decided to pursue my second Master's degree (my first was an MBA) I decided to get one in a topic that I was really interested in.
Pansing: What are sandal sole gorgets?
Keller: They are made of whelk shell and resemble the sole of a sandal, hence the name. The shells come from the Gulf of Mexico and are found in Glacial Kame burials (3000 B.C. to 500 B.C.). It is assumed that they were suspended around the neck or worn on clothing but that is something we don't know. How were they made, what was their purpose, how did they get here and where else can they be found, and how can we best analyze and portray the story of the gorgets to the public are all questions that that I will be investigating for my thesis.
Pansing: What drew you to study them for your thesis?
Keller: A couple things made this project intriguing to me. I grew up close to (and actually worked at for a short time) the Fort Recovery State Museum, an Ohio Historical Society Site which is operated by the Fort Recovery Historical Society. They have a display of 13 gorgets and when I told my professor about them he was really interested because they are fairly rare. In addition there is a lack of current research on the subject. And finally the Fort Recovery State Museum is interested in revamping the gorget exhibit. By doing this study I hope to be able to answer my thesis questions and be able to better inform the public about these rare and exotic pieces. Unlike some research that stays on a shelf in a library mine has the potential of impacting visitors to the site.
Pansing: How many have you looked at so far?
Keller: From what I have found out, there are somewhere around 100 known gorgets. Some are in museums and some are in private collections. All told I have analyzed 66 so far.
Pansing: What does your analysis consist of?
Keller: I am taking measurements of each gorget, including measurements and ratios of the holes. Detailed microscopic examination of etching and markings, wear patterns on the gorget and holes. The data and associated photographs will be put into a spreadsheet for analysis and report writing purposes. The information will be compared with data from existing literature to see if it supports past hypotheses on manufacture, use, and distributions or if new theories emerge.
Pansing: What is the neatest thing you have found so far?
Keller: Actually there are a few things. I recently took an historic archaeology class as part of my studies. For the class I did research on how historic Native Americans used gorgets in the mid to late 1800's. I looked at how they were suspended and this made me wonder if this is how shell gorgets were suspended in the past. Another thing I discovered is that Glacial Kame burials, which have been primarily found in northwest Ohio, northeast Indiana, southern Michigan and southern Ontario, have also been found on the east coast.
Pansing: Was it pretty easy to find literature to help in your research?
Keller: There are a two books, one by Cunningham and one by Converse. Other than that there are multiple small articles and site reports.
Pansing: What goes into doing a Master's thesis?
Keller: First thing and often the hardest is to come up with a topic. I was fortunate and had mine right away. You need a well defined research design; what you will study and why, research methods and listing of available literature. At the end of the research phase you start writing. You list and discuss all of your information, draw your conclusions and make recommendations for future research. So far I have around 500 hours put into the project and I would guess I am over halfway done.
Pansing: Well we certainly wish you good luck and look forward to seeing the Thesis once it is complete!
Keller: Thanks!

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

FORT ANCIENT WINTER SOLSTICE CELEBRATION

Fort Ancient recently held its first Winter Solstice Sunrise event on Saturday 20 December 2008, one day before the actual solstice. In a fund-raising effort for the site, Charlie and Dee Wright of Indian Hills commissioned Cincinnati-based artist, Mary Louise Holt, to create a painting of an ancient Hopewell Winter Solstice Sunrise celebration at Fort Ancient. Holt had 62 volunteers at the site at sunrise to participate in the event. Boy Scout Troop 36 assisted with gathering brush and placing it on top of the northernmost of the four stone covered earthen mounds that together form a perfect square. The mound had been excavated in 1894 and restored, so no original Hopewell architecture was threatened by this staging of what such an ancient ceremony might have been like.

Just before sunrise, the scouts put a torch to the wood on the mound, creating a fire that lit up the morning sky. According to site manager Jack Blosser, "In Native American oral traditions, there is a great sense of balance within nature. When the people saw the sun rising 2,000 years ago, what better to greet the sun with than its brother, fire." The rising sun was greeted by another ball of flame, creating a balance between the heavens and the earth.

Of course we do not know precisely what sorts of ceremonies were held at this ancient earthwork 2,000-years-ago, but when Warren K. Moorehead, the Ohio Historical Society's first curator of archaeology, originally excavated the four mounds, he noted that at least one of them was "covered with burnt stone." This suggests that fire did figure prominently in the rituals that took place here. And the late Patricia Essenpreis and David Duszynski proposed in 1989 that the Winter Solstice Sunrise could be viewed from the northernmost mound through one of the gateways in the enclosure. This supports the idea that significant astronomical events were commemorated in the monumental architecture of the Hopewell.
There has been, for many years, a Summer Solstice Sunrise celebration at Fort Ancient based on the observation by Essenpreis and Duszynski that this pivotal sunrise could be viewed from the westernmost mound through another gateway in the North Fort. That both the Summer and Winter Solstice sunrises appear to have been encoded in the alignments of the Fort Ancient earthworks supports the idea that these seasonal events formed key elements in the ceremonial calendar of the Hopewell culture. December's Winter Solstice Sunrise event honors the ancient builders of Fort Ancient with a ceremony linking past with present and earth with sky.

CONNECTING TO COLLECTIONS Talk, Saturday, 24 January 2009, 2:00 PM

Ohio's First Industry: the Archaeology of Flint Ridge

Join me this Saturday at the Ohio Historical Center for a presentation on the archaeology of Flint Ridge – one of Ohio's very special places. Indeed, this place has been special for more than 15,000 years!

Flint Ridge has been called the "Great Indian Quarry of Ohio" and, according to pioneer Ohio archaeologist Charles Smith, "it is by all odds entitled to be called the 'Flint Ridge' not only of Ohio but of the whole country." Quarry pits and workshop sites occur in profusion across more than 2,000 acres, but they are most thickly concentrated within the limits of Flint Ridge State Memorial in southeastern Licking County, Ohio. Hundreds, if not thousands, of quarry pits occur along the ridge ranging in size from 12 to 80 feet in diameter. A few are as deep as 20 feet, although most are between 3 and 6 feet in depth.

American Indians have used Flint Ridge as a quarry for over 15,000 years, but the popularity of this rainbow-colored flint reached its peak during the Middle Woodland period, between 2,100 and 1,500 years ago. The Hopewell culture of central and southern Ohio, in particular, crafted a variety of tools from this material that were distributed through some kind of "interaction sphere" across much of eastern North America.

William C. Mills, Curator of Archaeology for the Ohio Historical Society, investigated Flint Ridge in 1920. He examined over 30 quarry pits and numerous workshop sites. He found that the Hopewell flintworkers came to the site principally to make three kinds of tools: triangular bifacial preforms of varying size, small, blocky cores generally conical in shape, and the long, thin bladelets that they struck from these prepared cores.

In 1997 and again in 2001, I directed large-scale excavations at Flint Ridge. We learned a number of things from this work, but foremost among our conclusions was that Mills got it right. While other ancient cultures came to Flint Ridge intermittently to replenish their tool kits, the Hopewell culture came with a specialized work force to Flint Ridge to quarry the flint on an industrial scale and work it down into the three basic forms that Mills recognized. The bifaces, cores, and bladelets could have been packed and carried to the Newark Earthworks where it was exchanged or given as gifts to visiting pilgrims. Most of the quarries and workshops on Flint Ridge must be the remains of this Hopewellian "industry."

For reasons that are still not understood, the use of Flint Ridge flint dropped off markedly after the Hopewell era. It is almost as if this highly distinctive material, so closely associated with the Hopewellian experience, became taboo for the people that had abandoned the other elements of Hopewell culture.

Flint Ridge State Memorial is located four miles north of Interstate 70, three miles north of Brownsville, in Licking County, Ohio. Several trails wind through the flint pits and workshops. A small museum located at the site is built around an actual excavated flint quarry pit. Artifacts recovered from excavations at Flint Ridge and the nearby Hazlett Mound are included in the exhibits. For more information, see the Ohio Historical Society's website: http://ohsweb.ohiohistory.org/places/c01/.

If you're interested in reading more about the recent work at Flint Ridge, check out the technical article I wrote with Ohio State University archaeologist Rick Yerkes and my colleague here at OHS, Bill Pickard:

Lepper, Bradley T., Richard W. Yerkes, and William H. Pickard
2001 Prehistoric flint procurement strategies at Flint Ridge, Licking County, Ohio. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 26:53-78.
You also can read Mills' original article online:

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

ARCHAEOASTRONOMY IN THE AMERICAS


SunWatch Indian Village
2009 Lecture Series


Free and open to the public!

The first Saturday of every month, between February and May 2009, 10:30 AM to noon!




Ancient Skywatchers of North America
Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:30am - 12:00pm
Bill Iseminger, Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site, Collinsville, IL,

Hopewell Archaeoastronomy and Geomancy: New Discoveries Using LiDAR
Saturday, April 4, 2009, 10:30am - 12:00pm
Dr. William F. Romain, Research Associate, Ohio State University Newark Earthworks Center

Prehistoric Astronomy in the American Southwest
Saturday, May 2, 2009, 10:30am - 12:00pm
J. McKim (Kim) Malville, Emeritus Professor of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences at the University of Colorado at Boulder.


The SunWatch Lecture Series is free and open to the public. Admission fees will apply for guests wishing to explore the Village or the Interpretive Center before or after the presentations.

For more information, check out the SunWatch Lecture Series webpage at http://www.sunwatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14:lecture-series&catid=4:special-events&Itemid=8
or give them a call at (937) 268-8199.

Thursday, January 08, 2009

NEW ADDITIONS TO THE NEWARK EARTHWORKS VISITORS CENTER

In 1928, Ohio Historical Society archaeologist Emerson Greenman excavated the so-called "Eagle Mound" in the Great Circle at the Newark Earthworks. He also excavated the remains of the Wells Mound Group, located a few blocks to the west of the Great Circle.

At Eagle Mound, Greenman uncovered the remains of a ceremonial Big House and a handful of artifacts that may have been left as offerings. He found a crescent-shaped ornament made from copper and a possible beaver effigy also made from copper.

The three mounds of the Wells Mound Group had been badly damaged by looting and plowing. Some farmer apparently had even used one of the mounds as a place to bury a horse. Even so, Greenman still made a few interesting discoveries here as well. He recovered a spear point made from Flint Ridge flint as well as a shovel-shaped slate pendant from Wells Mound No. 1. In addition, he found a slab of mica from Wells Mound No. 2.

Very little has ever been published about the results of these excavations and the artifacts have never been displayed – until now. The Ohio Historical Society has brought these artifacts back "home" to Newark where they now form a key part of the new exhibits at the Newark Earthworks Visitors Center.

Other new additions include a copper ax found near the Eagle Mound and a mannequin representing a Hopewell culture spiritual leader depicted in a stone figurine found during excavations at Newark in 1881. The Shaman of Newark, also referred to as the Wray figurine, is a remarkable carving of a person wearing bear regalia who may, in fact, be shown in the act of transforming from a human into a bear-spirit as part of a shamanic ceremony.

These new additions allow visitors to make a more personal connection with the ancient builders of the Newark Earthworks. The Shaman of Newark seems to come to life to share the secret of how the earthworks are tied to the intricate cycle of the rising and setting of the moon. And, for the first time in two millennia, a few of the actual artifacts made and used by the people who built the earthworks are on display for visitors to the earthworks to experience.